Purpose – This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of different digital nudging architectures in promoting sustainable consumer behaviour during the shopping experience. This research addresses a critical research gap by providing the first empirical comparison of theoretically grounded digital nudging models specifically designed to foster conscious shopping decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A between-subjects experimental design involving 195 participants was implemented to compare the impact of three digital nudging architectures – make together, in-sourcing and crowd-sourcing – on multiple consumer outcomes. These outcomes include engagement, perceived usefulness, willingness to pay a premium price, trust in the retailer, retailer credibility and commitment to charitable initiatives. Findings – All three digital nudging architectures elicited generally positive consumer evaluations, although with differentiated outcome profiles. The only statistically significant difference concerned the perceived relevance of the initiative, which was higher in the crowd-sourcing condition than in the make together condition. Descriptive patterns further suggest that crowd-sourcing is associated with stronger relational and engagement-oriented responses, in-sourcing with higher perceived usefulness and retailer credibility and make together with stronger purchaserelated responses such as intention to buy and willingness to pay a premium. Research limitations/implications – Managerial implications are provided for designing engaging, ethically responsible digital nudges and sustainability campaigns in retail environments. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical study to compare distinct digital nudging architectures in a sustainability context, offering a structured, theory-driven evaluation. The study advances knowledge in behavioural marketing and digital retailing by (1) offering a structured comparison of nudging architectures for sustainability goals, (2) evaluating how such interventions influence cognitive, emotional and behavioural consumer outcomes, (3) emphasising the strategic role of retailers in digital sustainability communication and (4) addressing the ethical acceptability of nudging in preserving consumer autonomy.

Choose sustainable! How digital nudging architectures shape sustainable choices and consumer perceptions / Aiolfi, S., Bellini, S., Pellegrini, D., Bacchilega, C.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING. - ISSN 0736-3761. - (2026). [10.1108/JCM-07-2025-8124]

Choose sustainable! How digital nudging architectures shape sustainable choices and consumer perceptions

Simone Aiolfi
;
Silvia Bellini;Davide Pellegrini;Chiara Bacchilega
2026-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of different digital nudging architectures in promoting sustainable consumer behaviour during the shopping experience. This research addresses a critical research gap by providing the first empirical comparison of theoretically grounded digital nudging models specifically designed to foster conscious shopping decisions. Design/methodology/approach – A between-subjects experimental design involving 195 participants was implemented to compare the impact of three digital nudging architectures – make together, in-sourcing and crowd-sourcing – on multiple consumer outcomes. These outcomes include engagement, perceived usefulness, willingness to pay a premium price, trust in the retailer, retailer credibility and commitment to charitable initiatives. Findings – All three digital nudging architectures elicited generally positive consumer evaluations, although with differentiated outcome profiles. The only statistically significant difference concerned the perceived relevance of the initiative, which was higher in the crowd-sourcing condition than in the make together condition. Descriptive patterns further suggest that crowd-sourcing is associated with stronger relational and engagement-oriented responses, in-sourcing with higher perceived usefulness and retailer credibility and make together with stronger purchaserelated responses such as intention to buy and willingness to pay a premium. Research limitations/implications – Managerial implications are provided for designing engaging, ethically responsible digital nudges and sustainability campaigns in retail environments. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first empirical study to compare distinct digital nudging architectures in a sustainability context, offering a structured, theory-driven evaluation. The study advances knowledge in behavioural marketing and digital retailing by (1) offering a structured comparison of nudging architectures for sustainability goals, (2) evaluating how such interventions influence cognitive, emotional and behavioural consumer outcomes, (3) emphasising the strategic role of retailers in digital sustainability communication and (4) addressing the ethical acceptability of nudging in preserving consumer autonomy.
2026
Choose sustainable! How digital nudging architectures shape sustainable choices and consumer perceptions / Aiolfi, S., Bellini, S., Pellegrini, D., Bacchilega, C.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING. - ISSN 0736-3761. - (2026). [10.1108/JCM-07-2025-8124]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3067494
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact