This study will provide an overview and a description of the most promising alternatives to conventional thermal treatments for juice stabilization, as well as a review of the literature data on fruit and vegetable juice processing in terms of three key parameters in juice production, which are microbial reduction, enzyme inactivation, and nutrient-compound retention. The alternatives taken into consideration in this work can be divided, according to the action mechanism upon which these are based, in non-conventional thermal treatments, among which microwave heating (MWH) and ohmic heating (OH), and non-thermal treatments, among which electrical treatments, i.e., pulsed electric fields (PEF), high-pressure processing (HPP), radiation treatments such as ultraviolet light (UVL) and high-intensity pulsed light (PL), and sonication (HIUS) treatment, and inert-gas treatments, i.e., the pressure change technology (PCT) and supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) treatments. For each technology, a list of the main critical process parameters (CPP), advantages (PROS), and disadvantages (CONS) will be provided. In addition, for the non-thermal technologies, a summary of the most relevant published result of their application on fruit and vegetable juices will be presented. On top of that, a comparison of typical specific working energy costs for the main effective and considered technologies will be reported in terms of KJ per kilograms of processed product.
Non-conventional Stabilization for Fruit and Vegetable Juices: Overview, Technological Constraints, and Energy Cost Comparison / Vignali, G.; Gozzi, M.; Pelacci, M.; Stefanini, R.. - In: FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1935-5149. - 15:8(2022), pp. 1729-1747. [10.1007/s11947-022-02772-w]
Non-conventional Stabilization for Fruit and Vegetable Juices: Overview, Technological Constraints, and Energy Cost Comparison
Vignali G.;Pelacci M.;Stefanini R.
2022-01-01
Abstract
This study will provide an overview and a description of the most promising alternatives to conventional thermal treatments for juice stabilization, as well as a review of the literature data on fruit and vegetable juice processing in terms of three key parameters in juice production, which are microbial reduction, enzyme inactivation, and nutrient-compound retention. The alternatives taken into consideration in this work can be divided, according to the action mechanism upon which these are based, in non-conventional thermal treatments, among which microwave heating (MWH) and ohmic heating (OH), and non-thermal treatments, among which electrical treatments, i.e., pulsed electric fields (PEF), high-pressure processing (HPP), radiation treatments such as ultraviolet light (UVL) and high-intensity pulsed light (PL), and sonication (HIUS) treatment, and inert-gas treatments, i.e., the pressure change technology (PCT) and supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) treatments. For each technology, a list of the main critical process parameters (CPP), advantages (PROS), and disadvantages (CONS) will be provided. In addition, for the non-thermal technologies, a summary of the most relevant published result of their application on fruit and vegetable juices will be presented. On top of that, a comparison of typical specific working energy costs for the main effective and considered technologies will be reported in terms of KJ per kilograms of processed product.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
s11947-022-02772-w.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.7 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.7 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.