In this paper, the results obtained by five independent methods for the quantification of fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 in raw maize are reported. Five naturally contaminated maize samples and a reference material were analyzed in three different laboratories. Although each method was validated and common calibrants were used, a poor agreement about fumonisin contamination levels was obtained. In order to investigate the interactions among analyte and matrix leading to this lack of consistency, the occurrence of fumonisin derivatives was checked. Significant amounts of hidden fumonisins were detected for all the considered samples. Furthermore, the application of an in vitro digestion protocol to raw maize allowed for a higher recovery of native fumonisins, suggesting that the interaction occurring among analytes and matrix macromolecules is associative rather than covalent. Depending on the analytical method as well as the maize sample, only 37–68% of the total fumonisin concentrations were found to be extractable from the samples. These results are particularly impressive and significant in the case of the certified reference material, underlying the actual difficulties in ascertaining the trueness of a method for fumonisin determination, opening thus an important issue for risk assessment.

Difficulties in fumonisin determination: the issue of hidden fumonisins / Dall'Asta, Chiara; Mangia, Mattia; Berthiller, F.; Molinelli, A.; Sulyok, M.; Schuhmacher, R.; Krska, R.; Galaverna, Gianni; Dossena, Arnaldo; Marchelli, Rosangela. - In: ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 1618-2642. - 395:(2009), pp. 1335-1345. [10.1007/s00216-009-2933-3]

Difficulties in fumonisin determination: the issue of hidden fumonisins

DALL'ASTA, Chiara;MANGIA, Mattia;GALAVERNA, Gianni;DOSSENA, Arnaldo;MARCHELLI, Rosangela
2009-01-01

Abstract

In this paper, the results obtained by five independent methods for the quantification of fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 in raw maize are reported. Five naturally contaminated maize samples and a reference material were analyzed in three different laboratories. Although each method was validated and common calibrants were used, a poor agreement about fumonisin contamination levels was obtained. In order to investigate the interactions among analyte and matrix leading to this lack of consistency, the occurrence of fumonisin derivatives was checked. Significant amounts of hidden fumonisins were detected for all the considered samples. Furthermore, the application of an in vitro digestion protocol to raw maize allowed for a higher recovery of native fumonisins, suggesting that the interaction occurring among analytes and matrix macromolecules is associative rather than covalent. Depending on the analytical method as well as the maize sample, only 37–68% of the total fumonisin concentrations were found to be extractable from the samples. These results are particularly impressive and significant in the case of the certified reference material, underlying the actual difficulties in ascertaining the trueness of a method for fumonisin determination, opening thus an important issue for risk assessment.
2009
Difficulties in fumonisin determination: the issue of hidden fumonisins / Dall'Asta, Chiara; Mangia, Mattia; Berthiller, F.; Molinelli, A.; Sulyok, M.; Schuhmacher, R.; Krska, R.; Galaverna, Gianni; Dossena, Arnaldo; Marchelli, Rosangela. - In: ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY. - ISSN 1618-2642. - 395:(2009), pp. 1335-1345. [10.1007/s00216-009-2933-3]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Difficulties in fumonisin determination_the issue of hidden fumonisins.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 181.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
181.82 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2285195
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 117
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 105
social impact