The ability of three commercial inulins (Raftilose ®P95, Frutafit IQ®, and Frutafit TEX®) with different chemical composition (oligo-polysaccharides profile) to form gels (at 25 and 50 °C) was evaluated. Raftilose®P95 (rich in mono-disaccharides) did not form gels, Frutafit IQ® (mainly oligosaccharides) gelatinized in the 30-60% w/w concentration range and Frutafit TEX ® (mainly long-chain saccharides) in the 20-40% w/w range. Textural and thermal properties of the gels were studied and their stability was evaluated during storage at 4 °C. Frutafit TEX® gels (both fresh and during storage) were harder, more adhesive, and less cohesive than Frutafit IQ® gels (40% w/w). At 40% w/w, Frutafit TEX ® gels had a significantly higher amount of freezable water than Frutafit IQ®, and the DSC thermogram line shapes indicated that ice melting was more uniform and occurred at higher temperatures in Frutafit TEX® than in the Frutafit IQ® gels. Ice melting profile was not significantly affected by both gelification temperature and storage time. Frutafit IQ® gels were more stable than Frutafit TEX® gels during storage.
Physico-chemical characterization and stability of inulin gels / Chiavaro, Emma; Vittadini, Elena Giovanna Piera; Corradini, Claudio. - In: EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 1438-2377. - 225:1(2007), pp. 85-94. [10.1007/s00217-006-0385-y]
Physico-chemical characterization and stability of inulin gels
CHIAVARO, Emma;VITTADINI, Elena Giovanna Piera;CORRADINI, Claudio
2007-01-01
Abstract
The ability of three commercial inulins (Raftilose ®P95, Frutafit IQ®, and Frutafit TEX®) with different chemical composition (oligo-polysaccharides profile) to form gels (at 25 and 50 °C) was evaluated. Raftilose®P95 (rich in mono-disaccharides) did not form gels, Frutafit IQ® (mainly oligosaccharides) gelatinized in the 30-60% w/w concentration range and Frutafit TEX ® (mainly long-chain saccharides) in the 20-40% w/w range. Textural and thermal properties of the gels were studied and their stability was evaluated during storage at 4 °C. Frutafit TEX® gels (both fresh and during storage) were harder, more adhesive, and less cohesive than Frutafit IQ® gels (40% w/w). At 40% w/w, Frutafit TEX ® gels had a significantly higher amount of freezable water than Frutafit IQ®, and the DSC thermogram line shapes indicated that ice melting was more uniform and occurred at higher temperatures in Frutafit TEX® than in the Frutafit IQ® gels. Ice melting profile was not significantly affected by both gelification temperature and storage time. Frutafit IQ® gels were more stable than Frutafit TEX® gels during storage.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
EFRT1.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
441.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
441.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.