Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications after colorectal resection. Although several strategies have been introduced in the fields of AL prevention, diagnosis and management, their application in clinical practice is still to be assessed. A 26-item-questionnaire was administered between December 2023 and March 2024 to residents in general surgery and surgeons to analyse the actual clinical practice in Italy, in general and with respect of surgical experience in colorectal surgery. A total of 414 responses were analyzed. Most respondents were general surgeons/residents working in public or university hospitals; over one-half had limited surgical experience (< 50 colectomies). Regarding low colo-rectal anastomosis techniques, Knight-Griffen technique (44.0%) and hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (37.4%) were the most commonly reported. "Preventive" measures included reinforcement sutures (29.7%) and dog-ear avoidance procedures (21.7%); among intraoperative tests, hydropneumatic leak test (94.9%), "rings'" check (87.9%) and indocyanine green fluorescence (61.8%) were widely used. Protective stomas were created selectively in 52.4% of cases, with ileostomy largely preferred (93.9%). Despite ERAS recommendations, drains were frequently placed, particularly after anterior resection (73.7%). In the case of paucisymptomatic leak, conservative management was preferred (73.4% for ileo-colic, 65.9% for colorectal), at times associated with endoscopic procedures (15.2%). Decisions regarding diverting stomas or Hartmann's proedures were mainly driven by clinical presentation rather than AL size. Endoscopic treatments, especially intracavitary "sponge" placement, have gained widespread acceptance. This survey highlights partial adoption of current guidelines. Although traditional practices, including drainage placement, persist, conservative and endoscopic approaches are increasingly adopted in the management of AL.
Prevention and management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A SICCR survey / Costi, R., Annicchiarico, A., Amato, A., Folliero, C., Guerci, C., Facchinetti, A., Montali, F., Null, N., Petrina, A., Dezi, A., Falcone, A., Fernicola, A., Oliva, A., Buonanno, A., Porcu, A., Serventi, A., Stocco, A., Vannelli, A., Rocca, A., Marano, A., et al.. - In: UPDATES IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2038-131X. - (2026). [10.1007/s13304-026-02625-7]
Prevention and management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A SICCR survey
: Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most feared complications after colorectal resection. Although several strategies have been introduced in the fields of AL prevention, diagnosis and management, their application in clinical practice is still to be assessed. A 26-item-questionnaire was administered between December 2023 and March 2024 to residents in general surgery and surgeons to analyse the actual clinical practice in Italy, in general and with respect of surgical experience in colorectal surgery. A total of 414 responses were analyzed. Most respondents were general surgeons/residents working in public or university hospitals; over one-half had limited surgical experience (< 50 colectomies). Regarding low colo-rectal anastomosis techniques, Knight-Griffen technique (44.0%) and hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis (37.4%) were the most commonly reported. "Preventive" measures included reinforcement sutures (29.7%) and dog-ear avoidance procedures (21.7%); among intraoperative tests, hydropneumatic leak test (94.9%), "rings'" check (87.9%) and indocyanine green fluorescence (61.8%) were widely used. Protective stomas were created selectively in 52.4% of cases, with ileostomy largely preferred (93.9%). Despite ERAS recommendations, drains were frequently placed, particularly after anterior resection (73.7%). In the case of paucisymptomatic leak, conservative management was preferred (73.4% for ileo-colic, 65.9% for colorectal), at times associated with endoscopic procedures (15.2%). Decisions regarding diverting stomas or Hartmann's proedures were mainly driven by clinical presentation rather than AL size. Endoscopic treatments, especially intracavitary "sponge" placement, have gained widespread acceptance. This survey highlights partial adoption of current guidelines. Although traditional practices, including drainage placement, persist, conservative and endoscopic approaches are increasingly adopted in the management of AL.
Prevention and management of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: evolving trends among Italian surgeons. A SICCR survey / Costi, R., Annicchiarico, A., Amato, A., Folliero, C., Guerci, C., Facchinetti, A., Montali, F., Null, N., Petrina, A., Dezi, A., Falcone, A., Fernicola, A., Oliva, A., Buonanno, A., Porcu, A., Serventi, A., Stocco, A., Vannelli, A., Rocca, A., Marano, A., et al.. - In: UPDATES IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2038-131X. - (2026). [10.1007/s13304-026-02625-7]
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3067434
Citazioni
ND
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.