The paper focuses on how Justinian and his chancellery resolved controversial cases found in the works of classical jurists. It is divided into two parts. In the first, an examination of the quinquaginta decisiones and the constitutiones ad commodum propositi operis pertinentes demonstrates the existence of a fixed expository structure (casus, quaestio, solutio). In the second, C. 6.30.21 and C. 6.24.14 are analysed to show how the emperor adopts a way of reasoning similar to that of the classical jurists. In particular, the legislator adopts the logicallegal instrument of the distinctio.
Iustinianus distinguit / Bono, Francesco. - In: JUS. - ISSN 1827-7942. - 6(2022), pp. 56-81. [10.26350/18277942_000100]
Iustinianus distinguit
francesco bono
2022-01-01
Abstract
The paper focuses on how Justinian and his chancellery resolved controversial cases found in the works of classical jurists. It is divided into two parts. In the first, an examination of the quinquaginta decisiones and the constitutiones ad commodum propositi operis pertinentes demonstrates the existence of a fixed expository structure (casus, quaestio, solutio). In the second, C. 6.30.21 and C. 6.24.14 are analysed to show how the emperor adopts a way of reasoning similar to that of the classical jurists. In particular, the legislator adopts the logicallegal instrument of the distinctio.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
BONO JUSONLINE_6_2022_Final.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
289.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
289.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.