We studied the basis for a further harmonisation of meat inspection by comparing data from seven European countries through a mapping exercise. Focus was on the code systems used to register findings during meat inspection. Additionally, meat inspection data for slaughtered pigs from 2019 were collected from the same countries. This allowed us to compare the number of codes available, the frequencies of different findings and the terminology used. Codes with similar meaning were compiled. To elucidate the most common codes leading to total and to partial condemnation, two lists were created. The results showed huge variations between the systems, probably reflecting the historical development. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Still, the diverse terminology observed made it a challenge to compare data between countries. We suggest harmonising the terminology for meat inspection findings while respecting the national epidemiological situation, the local food safety culture, and the trade agreements in force. This will enable easy comparisons of data between abattoirs, regions, and countries.
ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN MEAT INSPECTION CODE SYSTEMS DISCLOSES WIDE VARIATIONS IN TERMINOLOGY AND DATA / Alban, Lis; Vieira-Pinto, Madalena; Meemken, Diana; Maurer, Patric; Ghidini, Sergio; Santos, Susana; Gómez Laguna, Jaime; Laukkanen-Ninios, Riikka; Alvseike, Ole; Langkabel, Nina. - ELETTRONICO. - (2022), pp. 051.169-051.172. (Intervento presentato al convegno 4th International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance nel 03-05 May, 2022).
ANALYSIS OF EUROPEAN MEAT INSPECTION CODE SYSTEMS DISCLOSES WIDE VARIATIONS IN TERMINOLOGY AND DATA
Sergio Ghidini;
2022-01-01
Abstract
We studied the basis for a further harmonisation of meat inspection by comparing data from seven European countries through a mapping exercise. Focus was on the code systems used to register findings during meat inspection. Additionally, meat inspection data for slaughtered pigs from 2019 were collected from the same countries. This allowed us to compare the number of codes available, the frequencies of different findings and the terminology used. Codes with similar meaning were compiled. To elucidate the most common codes leading to total and to partial condemnation, two lists were created. The results showed huge variations between the systems, probably reflecting the historical development. Each system has its advantages and disadvantages. Still, the diverse terminology observed made it a challenge to compare data between countries. We suggest harmonising the terminology for meat inspection findings while respecting the national epidemiological situation, the local food safety culture, and the trade agreements in force. This will enable easy comparisons of data between abattoirs, regions, and countries.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.