Introduction: We report updated data from a phase 2 randomized study evaluating brigatinib in crizotinib-refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive NSCLC. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to take either oral brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (arm B), stratified by central nervous system (CNS) metastases and best response to crizotinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included CNS versus ex-CNS target lesion response and correlation of depth of response with PFS and OS. Results: Among 222 randomized patients (112 and 110 in arms A and B, respectively), 59 (27%) remained on brigatinib at analysis (median follow-up: 19.6 versus 24.3 months). At baseline, 71% and 67% had brain lesions among A and B arms, respectively. Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate was 46% versus 56%. Median IRC-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4–12.8) versus 16.7 months (11.6–21.4). Median OS was 29.5 months (18.2–not reached) versus 34.1 months (27.7–not reached). IRC-confirmed intracranial objective response rate in patients with measurable baseline brain lesions was 50% (13 of 26) versus 67% (12 of 18); median duration of intracranial response was 9.4 versus 16.6 months. IRC-assessed iPFS was 12.8 versus 18.4 months. Across arms, median IRC-assessed PFS was 1.9, 5.5, 11.1, 16.7, and 15.6 months for patients with no, 1%–25%, 26%–50%, 51%–75%, and 76%–100% target lesion shrinkage, respectively. No new safety findings were observed with longer follow-up. Conclusions: Brigatinib (180 mg once daily with lead-in) continues to demonstrate robust PFS, long iPFS and duration of intracranial response, and high intracranial objective response rate in crizotinib-refractory patients. Depth of response may be an important end point to capture in future targeted therapy trials.

Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-up on Systemic and Intracranial Outcomes in the Phase 2 ALTA Trial / Huber, R. M.; Hansen, K. H.; Paz-Ares Rodriguez, L.; West, H. L.; Reckamp, K. L.; Leighl, N. B.; Tiseo, M.; Smit, E. F.; Kim, D. -W.; Gettinger, S. N.; Hochmair, M. J.; Kim, S. -W.; Langer, C. J.; Ahn, M. -J.; Kim, E. S.; Kerstein, D.; Groen, H. J. M.; Camidge, D. R.. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1556-0864. - 15:3(2020), pp. 404-415-415. [10.1016/j.jtho.2019.11.004]

Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-up on Systemic and Intracranial Outcomes in the Phase 2 ALTA Trial

Tiseo M.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: We report updated data from a phase 2 randomized study evaluating brigatinib in crizotinib-refractory anaplastic lymphoma kinase–positive NSCLC. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to take either oral brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (arm B), stratified by central nervous system (CNS) metastases and best response to crizotinib. The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory analyses included CNS versus ex-CNS target lesion response and correlation of depth of response with PFS and OS. Results: Among 222 randomized patients (112 and 110 in arms A and B, respectively), 59 (27%) remained on brigatinib at analysis (median follow-up: 19.6 versus 24.3 months). At baseline, 71% and 67% had brain lesions among A and B arms, respectively. Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate was 46% versus 56%. Median IRC-assessed PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4–12.8) versus 16.7 months (11.6–21.4). Median OS was 29.5 months (18.2–not reached) versus 34.1 months (27.7–not reached). IRC-confirmed intracranial objective response rate in patients with measurable baseline brain lesions was 50% (13 of 26) versus 67% (12 of 18); median duration of intracranial response was 9.4 versus 16.6 months. IRC-assessed iPFS was 12.8 versus 18.4 months. Across arms, median IRC-assessed PFS was 1.9, 5.5, 11.1, 16.7, and 15.6 months for patients with no, 1%–25%, 26%–50%, 51%–75%, and 76%–100% target lesion shrinkage, respectively. No new safety findings were observed with longer follow-up. Conclusions: Brigatinib (180 mg once daily with lead-in) continues to demonstrate robust PFS, long iPFS and duration of intracranial response, and high intracranial objective response rate in crizotinib-refractory patients. Depth of response may be an important end point to capture in future targeted therapy trials.
2020
Brigatinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK+ NSCLC: 2-Year Follow-up on Systemic and Intracranial Outcomes in the Phase 2 ALTA Trial / Huber, R. M.; Hansen, K. H.; Paz-Ares Rodriguez, L.; West, H. L.; Reckamp, K. L.; Leighl, N. B.; Tiseo, M.; Smit, E. F.; Kim, D. -W.; Gettinger, S. N.; Hochmair, M. J.; Kim, S. -W.; Langer, C. J.; Ahn, M. -J.; Kim, E. S.; Kerstein, D.; Groen, H. J. M.; Camidge, D. R.. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1556-0864. - 15:3(2020), pp. 404-415-415. [10.1016/j.jtho.2019.11.004]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ALTA Follow-up MS_V13.0 Author Approval 9-30-19.pdf

Open Access dal 10/11/2020

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.02 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.02 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2872428
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 114
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 96
social impact