{BACKGROUND:} Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty ({DSAEK)} allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated {DSAEK} interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy ({LCM)} in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted. {METHODS:} 18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent {DSAEK} were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted. {RESULTS:} Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.83; P {\textless} 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.87; P {\textless} 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.41; P = 0.15). {CONCLUSION:} {DSAEK} interface imaged with {LCM} is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in {DSAEK} surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. {LCM} should be considered as an added tool in post-{DSAEK} follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome.
In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy / G., Ferrari; V., Reichegger; Ludergnani, Luca; Delfini, Elisabetta; Macaluso, Claudio. - In: BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY. - ISSN 1471-2415. - 12:(2012), p. 32. [10.1186/1471-2415-12-32]
In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
LUDERGNANI, LUCA;DELFINI, Elisabetta;MACALUSO, Claudio
2012-01-01
Abstract
{BACKGROUND:} Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty ({DSAEK)} allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated {DSAEK} interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy ({LCM)} in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted. {METHODS:} 18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent {DSAEK} were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted. {RESULTS:} Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.83; P {\textless} 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.87; P {\textless} 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient -0.41; P = 0.15). {CONCLUSION:} {DSAEK} interface imaged with {LCM} is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in {DSAEK} surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. {LCM} should be considered as an added tool in post-{DSAEK} follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.