Beyond Efficacy: Policy, Delivery, and Equity Determinants of Long-Acting Monoclonal Antibody Uptake for Infant RSV Prevention—A WAidid Consensus Document

Background: Long-acting monoclonal antibodies have become an important strategy for preventing respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease in infants. Nirsevimab is the first product for which substantial post-licensure implementation data are available, whereas real-world evidence on clesrovimab remains limited. Although nirsevimab has demonstrated high efficacy, its uptake varies considerably across countries, healthcare systems, delivery settings, and population subgroups. This World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid) consensus document examines the policy, organizational, economic, and equity-related determinants that shape real-world implementation of long-acting monoclonal antibodies for infant RSV prevention. Methods: This study was conducted as a structured narrative review and WAidid expert consensus document. Astructured literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase for English-language publications relevant to nirsevimab uptake and implementation, complemented by targeted review of surveillance reports, policy documents, and public health guidance from the ECDC, UKHSA, and CDC, as well as reference lists of selected publications. Eligible sources included observational and real-world implementation studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, economic evaluations, guidelines, policy statements, surveillance reports, and relevant narrative reviews. Evidence was synthesized qualitatively according to policy frameworks, financing and reimbursement, delivery pathways, demographic and socioeconomic determinants, and healthcare-system factors influencing uptake. No statistical software was used because no quantitative re-analysis or meta-analysis was performed. Results: Nirsevimab uptake was strongly influenced by national RSV prevention policies, particularly whether countries adopted universal infant monoclonal antibody programs, maternal RSV vaccination strategies, dual maternal–infant approaches, or targeted risk-based models. Universal, publicly funded programs integrated into neonatal care achieved the highest and most homogeneous coverage, especially when administration occurred before hospital discharge and was supported by registry-based recall systems for infants born outside the RSV season. In contrast, fragmented, outpatient-only, insurancedependent, or partially reimbursed models were associated with lower, delayed, or more variable uptake. Additional determinants included product cost, reimbursement pathways, provider practices, caregiver awareness and health literacy, insurance status, income, race and ethnicity, geographic deprivation, and access to primary pediatric care. Most available evidence comes from high-income countries, limiting generalizability to low- and middleincome settings, where RSV burden is greatest and implementation constraints may differ. Conclusions: Successful implementation of long-acting monoclonal antibodies for infant RSV prevention requires more than regulatory approval and demonstrated efficacy. Equitable uptake depends on clear national recommendations, sustainable public financing, reliable product supply, integration into neonatal and primary pediatric care, proactive identification and recall of eligible infants, and targeted strategies to reduce socioeconomic and geographic disparities. Although many determinants identified in high-income settings are likely relevant globally, their feasibility, relative importance, and impact require dedicated evaluation in low- and middle-income countries.