Background: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a rare but severe condition associated with high mortality and a significant risk of long-term sequelae. Despite global vaccination efforts, the epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis continues to evolve, with serogroup B (MenB) representing the predominant cause of IMD in many high-income countries. Methods: This consensus document reviews current evidence on MenB epidemiology and the role of the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), with a focus on immunogenicity, strain coverage, real-world effectiveness, and remaining challenges. Results: Protein-based MenB vaccines have overcome the limitations of polysaccharide approaches, demonstrating robust immunogenicity across age groups. Real-world data confirm substantial vaccine effectiveness, particularly in infant immunization programs and outbreak settings, with significant reductions in disease incidence. For example, in England in the 3 years after vaccine introduction, MenB IMD incidence declined by 75% in immunized infants compared to unvaccinated controls. Adjusted vaccine efficacy was 52.7% after the two-dose primary series and 59.1% following the booster dose, highlighting the contribution of the booster. However, protection is influenced by antigenic variability among circulating strains, resulting in incomplete and geographically variable coverage. In addition, antibody waning over time and the limited impact on nasopharyngeal carriage reduce the potential for long-term and indirect protection. These factors highlight the need to optimize vaccination strategies, including the timing of booster doses, particularly in adolescents, and the role of vaccination in different epidemiological contexts. In this regard, it is not precisely defined whether infants who were immunized in the first year of life need a booster dose in the preschool period, especially in countries with a high incidence of MenB disease. Moreover, it is not established whether and when adolescents who were vaccinated both in infancy and during the preschool period need a booster dose. Economic considerations and variability in national immunization policies further contribute to heterogeneity in vaccine implementation. Emerging evidence suggests possible cross-protection against other meningococcal serogroups and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, although findings remain inconsistent across different risk groups and do not allow us to recommend 4CMenB vaccine beyond MenB IBD prevention. Conclusions: 4CMenB is an effective tool for preventing MenB IMD, although further studies are needed. Future strategies should prioritize age-targeted boosting and enhanced genomic surveillance to maximize impact.
Vaccination Against Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives—A Consensus Document of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid) / Esposito, S., Curtis, N., Heininger, U., Knuf, M., Ladhani, S., Marshall, H., Martinon-Torres, F., Safadi, M., Spoulou, V., Taha, M.K., Principi, N.. - In: VACCINES. - ISSN 2076-393X. - (2026). [10.3390/vaccines14060502]
Vaccination Against Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives—A Consensus Document of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid)
Susanna Esposito
;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Background: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a rare but severe condition associated with high mortality and a significant risk of long-term sequelae. Despite global vaccination efforts, the epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis continues to evolve, with serogroup B (MenB) representing the predominant cause of IMD in many high-income countries. Methods: This consensus document reviews current evidence on MenB epidemiology and the role of the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), with a focus on immunogenicity, strain coverage, real-world effectiveness, and remaining challenges. Results: Protein-based MenB vaccines have overcome the limitations of polysaccharide approaches, demonstrating robust immunogenicity across age groups. Real-world data confirm substantial vaccine effectiveness, particularly in infant immunization programs and outbreak settings, with significant reductions in disease incidence. For example, in England in the 3 years after vaccine introduction, MenB IMD incidence declined by 75% in immunized infants compared to unvaccinated controls. Adjusted vaccine efficacy was 52.7% after the two-dose primary series and 59.1% following the booster dose, highlighting the contribution of the booster. However, protection is influenced by antigenic variability among circulating strains, resulting in incomplete and geographically variable coverage. In addition, antibody waning over time and the limited impact on nasopharyngeal carriage reduce the potential for long-term and indirect protection. These factors highlight the need to optimize vaccination strategies, including the timing of booster doses, particularly in adolescents, and the role of vaccination in different epidemiological contexts. In this regard, it is not precisely defined whether infants who were immunized in the first year of life need a booster dose in the preschool period, especially in countries with a high incidence of MenB disease. Moreover, it is not established whether and when adolescents who were vaccinated both in infancy and during the preschool period need a booster dose. Economic considerations and variability in national immunization policies further contribute to heterogeneity in vaccine implementation. Emerging evidence suggests possible cross-protection against other meningococcal serogroups and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, although findings remain inconsistent across different risk groups and do not allow us to recommend 4CMenB vaccine beyond MenB IBD prevention. Conclusions: 4CMenB is an effective tool for preventing MenB IMD, although further studies are needed. Future strategies should prioritize age-targeted boosting and enhanced genomic surveillance to maximize impact.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


