Understanding the motives behind femicides is crucial to design effective prevention strategies and to support women's self-determination, free from threats to their mental and physical integrity. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter forensic study involving 27 Italian Institutes of Legal Medicine, analyzing 1238 female homicides (1950–2023). Cases were classified as femicide or non-femicide female homicide according to the medico-legal definition of femicide as the murder due to the failure to recognize women's right to self-determination. Motives were categorized into 12 groups, and relevant anamnestic and circumstantial data were collected. Of the 1238 cases, 410 were identified as femicides, 395 as non-femicides, and 433 were excluded for insufficient information. Femicides were most frequently driven by jealousy/rejection (n = 185; 45.1 %) and separation/divorce (n = 144; 35.1 %), often in the context of intimate partner violence or inability to accept the end of a relationship. Non-femicides were predominantly associated with the perpetrator's psychiatric disorder and/or drug addiction (n = 126; 31.9 %), violent aggression without gender-related motive (n = 69; 17.5 %), victim's illness (n = 63; 15.9 %), or economic reasons (n = 58; 14.7 %). In the Italian context, most femicides stem from relational dynamics − particularly jealousy, rejection, and separation − whereas non-femicides are more often linked to psychiatric illness, substance abuse, or non-gender-related aggression. Incorporating these findings into clinical risk assessment protocols, especially in emergency and primary care settings, may help identify women at high risk and guide targeted prevention strategies.

A nationwide forensic case-series of femicides in Italy – Part 1: Clues to the motives of the murder / Cecchi, R.; Santunione, A. L.; Camatti, J.; Buzzelli, A.; De Martina, A.; Sannella, A.; Vinceti, M.; Corbi, G.; Campobasso, C. P.; Sassani, M.; De Fazio, G. L.; Fais, P.; Pelotti, S.; Giorgetti, A.; Lacche, E.; Verzeletti, A.; Beltrame, B.; Zoia, R.; Franceschetti, L.; Vignali, G.; Moreschi, C.; Desinan, L.; Da Broi, U.; Zara, G.; Gino, S.; Bugelli, V.; Balduini, S.; Ginocchio, D.; Lubian, E.; Porzio, A.; Cascone, F.; Viel, G.; Angiola, F.; Introna, F.; Sablone, S.; Calvano, M.; Ausania, F.; Solari, L. -M.; Asmundo, A.; Ventura Spagnolo, E.; Baldino, G.; Visona, S. D.; Bodini, S.; Turillazzi, E.; Gabbrielli, M.; Bacchio, A.; Argo, A.; Malta, G.; D'Aloja, E.; Demontis, R.; Gozzelino, C.; Sanna, J.; Giorgetti, R.; Bora, F.; Ventura, F.; Caristo, I.; Oliva, A.; Mercuri, G.; Pomara, C.; Salerno, M.; Cipolloni, L.; Pinchi, V.; Focardi, M.; Marsella, L. T.; Treglia, M.; Aquila, I.; Sacco, M. A.; Gaudio, R.; Neri, M.; Marino, R.. - In: LEGAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1344-6223. - 78:(2025). [10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102703]

A nationwide forensic case-series of femicides in Italy – Part 1: Clues to the motives of the murder

Cecchi R.;Buzzelli A.;Vinceti M.;Pelotti S.;Vignali G.;Bugelli V.;Ginocchio D.;Pinchi V.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Understanding the motives behind femicides is crucial to design effective prevention strategies and to support women's self-determination, free from threats to their mental and physical integrity. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter forensic study involving 27 Italian Institutes of Legal Medicine, analyzing 1238 female homicides (1950–2023). Cases were classified as femicide or non-femicide female homicide according to the medico-legal definition of femicide as the murder due to the failure to recognize women's right to self-determination. Motives were categorized into 12 groups, and relevant anamnestic and circumstantial data were collected. Of the 1238 cases, 410 were identified as femicides, 395 as non-femicides, and 433 were excluded for insufficient information. Femicides were most frequently driven by jealousy/rejection (n = 185; 45.1 %) and separation/divorce (n = 144; 35.1 %), often in the context of intimate partner violence or inability to accept the end of a relationship. Non-femicides were predominantly associated with the perpetrator's psychiatric disorder and/or drug addiction (n = 126; 31.9 %), violent aggression without gender-related motive (n = 69; 17.5 %), victim's illness (n = 63; 15.9 %), or economic reasons (n = 58; 14.7 %). In the Italian context, most femicides stem from relational dynamics − particularly jealousy, rejection, and separation − whereas non-femicides are more often linked to psychiatric illness, substance abuse, or non-gender-related aggression. Incorporating these findings into clinical risk assessment protocols, especially in emergency and primary care settings, may help identify women at high risk and guide targeted prevention strategies.
2025
A nationwide forensic case-series of femicides in Italy – Part 1: Clues to the motives of the murder / Cecchi, R.; Santunione, A. L.; Camatti, J.; Buzzelli, A.; De Martina, A.; Sannella, A.; Vinceti, M.; Corbi, G.; Campobasso, C. P.; Sassani, M.; De Fazio, G. L.; Fais, P.; Pelotti, S.; Giorgetti, A.; Lacche, E.; Verzeletti, A.; Beltrame, B.; Zoia, R.; Franceschetti, L.; Vignali, G.; Moreschi, C.; Desinan, L.; Da Broi, U.; Zara, G.; Gino, S.; Bugelli, V.; Balduini, S.; Ginocchio, D.; Lubian, E.; Porzio, A.; Cascone, F.; Viel, G.; Angiola, F.; Introna, F.; Sablone, S.; Calvano, M.; Ausania, F.; Solari, L. -M.; Asmundo, A.; Ventura Spagnolo, E.; Baldino, G.; Visona, S. D.; Bodini, S.; Turillazzi, E.; Gabbrielli, M.; Bacchio, A.; Argo, A.; Malta, G.; D'Aloja, E.; Demontis, R.; Gozzelino, C.; Sanna, J.; Giorgetti, R.; Bora, F.; Ventura, F.; Caristo, I.; Oliva, A.; Mercuri, G.; Pomara, C.; Salerno, M.; Cipolloni, L.; Pinchi, V.; Focardi, M.; Marsella, L. T.; Treglia, M.; Aquila, I.; Sacco, M. A.; Gaudio, R.; Neri, M.; Marino, R.. - In: LEGAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1344-6223. - 78:(2025). [10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102703]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3052440
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact