Background: O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is responsible for the direct repair of O6-methylguanine lesions induced by alkylating agents, including temozolomide. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter hypermethylation is a well-established biomarker for temozolomide response in glioblastoma patients, also correlated with therapeutic response in colorectal cancer. Objectives: The ARETHUSA clinical trial aims to stratify colorectal cancer patients based on their mismatch repair status. Mismatch repair-deficient patients are eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PDL-1), whereas mismatch repair-proficient samples are screened for O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation to identify those suitable for temozolomide treatment. Methods: In this context, a subset of ARETHUSA metastatic colorectal cancer samples was used to compare two different techniques for assessing O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylation: Methyl-BEAMing, a highly sensitive digital PCR approach that combines emulsion PCR and flow cytometry, and droplet digital PCR, a more automated procedure that enables the rapid, operator-independent analysis of a large number of samples. Results: Our study clearly demonstrates that the results obtained using Methyl-BEAMing and droplet digital PCR are comparable, with both techniques showing similar accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Conclusions: Digital droplet PCR proved to be an efficient method for detecting gene promoter methylation. However, the Methyl-BEAMing method has proved more sensitive for detecting low quantities of DNA.

A Comparative Study of Methyl-BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for MGMT Gene Promoter Hypermethylation Detection / Macagno, Marco; Pessei, Valeria; Congiusta, Noemi; Lazzari, Luca; Bellomo, Sara Erika; Idrees, Fariha; Cavaliere, Alessandro; Pietrantonio, Filippo; Raimondi, Alessandra; Gusmaroli, Eleonora; Zampino, Maria Giulia; Gervaso, Lorenzo; Ciardiello, Davide; Mondello, Giuseppe; Santoro, Armando; Personeni, Nicola; Bonoldi, Emanuela; Aquilano, Maria Costanza; Valtorta, Emanuele; Siena, Salvatore; Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea; Amatu, Alessio; Bonazzina, Erica Francesca; Bencardino, Katia Bruna; Serini, Guido; Marsoni, Silvia; Barault, Ludovic; Di Nicolantonio, Federica; Maione, Federica. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - 14:22(2024), pp. 2467.1-2467.11. [10.3390/diagnostics14222467]

A Comparative Study of Methyl-BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for MGMT Gene Promoter Hypermethylation Detection

Personeni, Nicola;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is responsible for the direct repair of O6-methylguanine lesions induced by alkylating agents, including temozolomide. O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter hypermethylation is a well-established biomarker for temozolomide response in glioblastoma patients, also correlated with therapeutic response in colorectal cancer. Objectives: The ARETHUSA clinical trial aims to stratify colorectal cancer patients based on their mismatch repair status. Mismatch repair-deficient patients are eligible for treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PDL-1), whereas mismatch repair-proficient samples are screened for O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation to identify those suitable for temozolomide treatment. Methods: In this context, a subset of ARETHUSA metastatic colorectal cancer samples was used to compare two different techniques for assessing O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylation: Methyl-BEAMing, a highly sensitive digital PCR approach that combines emulsion PCR and flow cytometry, and droplet digital PCR, a more automated procedure that enables the rapid, operator-independent analysis of a large number of samples. Results: Our study clearly demonstrates that the results obtained using Methyl-BEAMing and droplet digital PCR are comparable, with both techniques showing similar accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Conclusions: Digital droplet PCR proved to be an efficient method for detecting gene promoter methylation. However, the Methyl-BEAMing method has proved more sensitive for detecting low quantities of DNA.
2024
A Comparative Study of Methyl-BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for MGMT Gene Promoter Hypermethylation Detection / Macagno, Marco; Pessei, Valeria; Congiusta, Noemi; Lazzari, Luca; Bellomo, Sara Erika; Idrees, Fariha; Cavaliere, Alessandro; Pietrantonio, Filippo; Raimondi, Alessandra; Gusmaroli, Eleonora; Zampino, Maria Giulia; Gervaso, Lorenzo; Ciardiello, Davide; Mondello, Giuseppe; Santoro, Armando; Personeni, Nicola; Bonoldi, Emanuela; Aquilano, Maria Costanza; Valtorta, Emanuele; Siena, Salvatore; Sartore-Bianchi, Andrea; Amatu, Alessio; Bonazzina, Erica Francesca; Bencardino, Katia Bruna; Serini, Guido; Marsoni, Silvia; Barault, Ludovic; Di Nicolantonio, Federica; Maione, Federica. - In: DIAGNOSTICS. - ISSN 2075-4418. - 14:22(2024), pp. 2467.1-2467.11. [10.3390/diagnostics14222467]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3040265
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact