Contagion processes on networks, including disease spreading, information diffusion, or social behaviors propagation, can be modeled as simple contagion, i.e., as a contagion process involving one connection at a time, or as complex contagion, in which multiple interactions are needed for a contagion event. Empirical data on spreading processes, however, even when available, do not easily allow us to uncover which of these underlying contagion mechanisms is at work. We propose a strategy to discriminate between these mechanisms upon the observation of a single instance of a spreading process. The strategy is based on the observation of the order in which network nodes are infected, and on its correlations with their local topology: these correlations differ between processes of simple contagion, processes involving threshold mechanisms, and processes driven by group interactions (i.e., by "higher-order"mechanisms). Our results improve our understanding of contagion processes and provide a method using only limited information to distinguish between several possible contagion mechanisms.

Distinguishing Simple and Complex Contagion Processes on Networks / Cencetti, Giulia; Contreras, Diego Andrés; Mancastroppa, Marco; Barrat, Alain. - In: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS. - ISSN 0031-9007. - 130:24(2023). [10.1103/physrevlett.130.247401]

Distinguishing Simple and Complex Contagion Processes on Networks

Mancastroppa, Marco;
2023-01-01

Abstract

Contagion processes on networks, including disease spreading, information diffusion, or social behaviors propagation, can be modeled as simple contagion, i.e., as a contagion process involving one connection at a time, or as complex contagion, in which multiple interactions are needed for a contagion event. Empirical data on spreading processes, however, even when available, do not easily allow us to uncover which of these underlying contagion mechanisms is at work. We propose a strategy to discriminate between these mechanisms upon the observation of a single instance of a spreading process. The strategy is based on the observation of the order in which network nodes are infected, and on its correlations with their local topology: these correlations differ between processes of simple contagion, processes involving threshold mechanisms, and processes driven by group interactions (i.e., by "higher-order"mechanisms). Our results improve our understanding of contagion processes and provide a method using only limited information to distinguish between several possible contagion mechanisms.
2023
Distinguishing Simple and Complex Contagion Processes on Networks / Cencetti, Giulia; Contreras, Diego Andrés; Mancastroppa, Marco; Barrat, Alain. - In: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS. - ISSN 0031-9007. - 130:24(2023). [10.1103/physrevlett.130.247401]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Mancastroppa-PhysRevLett.130.247401.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3015633
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact