Background: It is known that subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) need to exert more listening effort to achieve adequate speech recognition compared to normal hearing subjects. One tool for assessing listening effort is pupillometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive directional microphones in reducing listening effort for CI recipients. Methods: We evaluated listening in noise and listening effort degree (by pupillometry) in eight bimodal subjects with three types of CI microphones and in three sound configurations. Results: We found a correlation only between sound configurations and listening in noise score (p-value 0.0095). The evaluation of the microphone types shows worse scores in listening in noise with Opti Omni (+3.15 dB SNR) microphone than with Split Dir (+1.89 dB SNR) and Speech Omni (+1.43 dB SNR). No correlation was found between microphones and sound configurations and within the pupillometric data. Conclusions: Different types of microphones have different effects on the listening of CI patients. The difference in the orientation of the sound source is a factor that has an impact on the listening effort results. However, the pupillometry measurements do not significantly correlate with the different microphone types.

Do Different Types of Microphones Affect Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients? A Pupillometry Study / Ghiselli, S.; Pizzol, E.; Vincenti, V.; Fabrizi, E.; Salsi, D.; Cuda, D.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 13:4(2024). [10.3390/jcm13041134]

Do Different Types of Microphones Affect Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients? A Pupillometry Study

Vincenti V.;Cuda D.
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: It is known that subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) need to exert more listening effort to achieve adequate speech recognition compared to normal hearing subjects. One tool for assessing listening effort is pupillometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive directional microphones in reducing listening effort for CI recipients. Methods: We evaluated listening in noise and listening effort degree (by pupillometry) in eight bimodal subjects with three types of CI microphones and in three sound configurations. Results: We found a correlation only between sound configurations and listening in noise score (p-value 0.0095). The evaluation of the microphone types shows worse scores in listening in noise with Opti Omni (+3.15 dB SNR) microphone than with Split Dir (+1.89 dB SNR) and Speech Omni (+1.43 dB SNR). No correlation was found between microphones and sound configurations and within the pupillometric data. Conclusions: Different types of microphones have different effects on the listening of CI patients. The difference in the orientation of the sound source is a factor that has an impact on the listening effort results. However, the pupillometry measurements do not significantly correlate with the different microphone types.
2024
Do Different Types of Microphones Affect Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients? A Pupillometry Study / Ghiselli, S.; Pizzol, E.; Vincenti, V.; Fabrizi, E.; Salsi, D.; Cuda, D.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 13:4(2024). [10.3390/jcm13041134]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-13-01134.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.66 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/3003273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact