To cover up the horsemeat fraud, criminal food business operators tempered with their bookkeeping. This adversely affected the traceability of horsemeat and beef alike. This article assesses to what extent national food safety authorities in seven EU Member States issued recall orders to deal with this situation. Since no measurable food safety problems have been found, several countries consider that the conditions of Article 19 of Regulation 178/2002 have not been met. In some of these countries recalls orders, nevertheless, were issued based on national food law that has a wider scope. Other countries consider disruption of traceability sufficient justification to invoke Article 19.
Fighting Food Fraud / van der Meulen, S; ; Boin G, ; ; Bousoula I, ; ; Conte-Salinas N, ; ; Paganizza Valeria; Montanari Rodriguez Fuentes V, ; ; van der Meulen B, ; Paganizza, Valeria. - In: EUROPEAN FOOD AND FEED LAW REVIEW. - ISSN 1862-2720. - 10:1(2015), pp. 2-13.
Fighting Food Fraud
; Paganizza Valeria
2015-01-01
Abstract
To cover up the horsemeat fraud, criminal food business operators tempered with their bookkeeping. This adversely affected the traceability of horsemeat and beef alike. This article assesses to what extent national food safety authorities in seven EU Member States issued recall orders to deal with this situation. Since no measurable food safety problems have been found, several countries consider that the conditions of Article 19 of Regulation 178/2002 have not been met. In some of these countries recalls orders, nevertheless, were issued based on national food law that has a wider scope. Other countries consider disruption of traceability sufficient justification to invoke Article 19.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.