This essay argues for the moral legitimacy of suicide from a liberal perspective, starting with Hume's outstanding essay and ending with Camus, who argues that the sovereignty to decide one's own death coincides with a definition of freedom. The thesis is based on Mill's "harm principle" and is compared with "soft" (Feinberg) and "hard" versions of paternalism, with the "nudge movement" and with openly paternalistic or communitarian positions, with the aim of refuting them

Suicidio e libertà / Tincani, Persio. - In: RIFD. RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 1593-7135. - 98, s. 5:3(2021), pp. 511-532.

Suicidio e libertà

Tincani, Persio
2021-01-01

Abstract

This essay argues for the moral legitimacy of suicide from a liberal perspective, starting with Hume's outstanding essay and ending with Camus, who argues that the sovereignty to decide one's own death coincides with a definition of freedom. The thesis is based on Mill's "harm principle" and is compared with "soft" (Feinberg) and "hard" versions of paternalism, with the "nudge movement" and with openly paternalistic or communitarian positions, with the aim of refuting them
2021
Suicidio e libertà / Tincani, Persio. - In: RIFD. RIVISTA INTERNAZIONALE DI FILOSOFIA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 1593-7135. - 98, s. 5:3(2021), pp. 511-532.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2970686
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact