A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of feeding feed-grade urea (FGU) or slow -release urea (SRU) as a replacement for true protein supplements (control; CTR) in high-producing dairy cattle diets. Research papers were selected (n = 44) from experiments published between 1971 and 2021 based on the following criteria: dairy breed, detailed description of the isonitrogenous diets fed, provision of FGU or SRU (or both), high-yielding cows (>25 kg/cow per day), and results that included at least milk yield and composition, but data on nutrient intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation profile, and N utilization were also considered. Most studies compared only 2 treatments, and a network meta-analysis approach was adopted to compare the effects among CTR, FGU, and SRU. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model network meta-analysis. Forest plots of milk yield were used to visualize the estimated effect size of treatments. Cows included in the study produced 32.9 +/- 5.7 L/d of milk, 3.46 +/- 5.0% of fat, and 3.11 +/- 0.2% of protein with an intake of 22.1 +/- 3.45 kg of dry matter. Average diet composition was 1.65 +/- 0.07 Mcal of net energy for lactation, 16.4 +/- 1.45% CP, 30.8 +/- 5.91% neutral detergent fiber, and 23.0 +/- 4.62% starch. Average supply of FGU was 209 g/cow per day, whereas the average supply of SRU was 204 g/cow per day. With some exceptions, feeding FGU and SRU did not affect nutrient intake and digestibility, N utilization, and milk yield and composition. However, the FGU reduced the acetate proportion (61.6 vs. 59.7 mol/100 mol) and the SRU reduced the butyrate proportion (12.4 vs. 11.9 mol/100 mol) compared with CTR. Ruminal ammonia -N concentration increased from 8.47 to 11.5 and 9.3 mg/dL in CTR, FGU, and SRU, respectively. Urinary nitrogen excretion increased from 171 to 198 g/d in CTR versus the 2 urea treatments, respectively. The use of moderate doses of FGU in high-producing dairy cows may be justified based on its lower cost.

A network meta-analysis of the impact of feed-grade and slow-release ureas on lactating dairy cattle / Simoni, M; Fernandez-Turren, G; Righi, F; Rodríguez-Prado, M; Calsamiglia, S. - In: JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE. - ISSN 0022-0302. - 106:5(2023), pp. 3233-3245. [10.3168/jds.2022-22786]

A network meta-analysis of the impact of feed-grade and slow-release ureas on lactating dairy cattle

Simoni, M;Righi, F;
2023-01-01

Abstract

A network meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of feeding feed-grade urea (FGU) or slow -release urea (SRU) as a replacement for true protein supplements (control; CTR) in high-producing dairy cattle diets. Research papers were selected (n = 44) from experiments published between 1971 and 2021 based on the following criteria: dairy breed, detailed description of the isonitrogenous diets fed, provision of FGU or SRU (or both), high-yielding cows (>25 kg/cow per day), and results that included at least milk yield and composition, but data on nutrient intake, digestibility, ruminal fermentation profile, and N utilization were also considered. Most studies compared only 2 treatments, and a network meta-analysis approach was adopted to compare the effects among CTR, FGU, and SRU. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model network meta-analysis. Forest plots of milk yield were used to visualize the estimated effect size of treatments. Cows included in the study produced 32.9 +/- 5.7 L/d of milk, 3.46 +/- 5.0% of fat, and 3.11 +/- 0.2% of protein with an intake of 22.1 +/- 3.45 kg of dry matter. Average diet composition was 1.65 +/- 0.07 Mcal of net energy for lactation, 16.4 +/- 1.45% CP, 30.8 +/- 5.91% neutral detergent fiber, and 23.0 +/- 4.62% starch. Average supply of FGU was 209 g/cow per day, whereas the average supply of SRU was 204 g/cow per day. With some exceptions, feeding FGU and SRU did not affect nutrient intake and digestibility, N utilization, and milk yield and composition. However, the FGU reduced the acetate proportion (61.6 vs. 59.7 mol/100 mol) and the SRU reduced the butyrate proportion (12.4 vs. 11.9 mol/100 mol) compared with CTR. Ruminal ammonia -N concentration increased from 8.47 to 11.5 and 9.3 mg/dL in CTR, FGU, and SRU, respectively. Urinary nitrogen excretion increased from 171 to 198 g/d in CTR versus the 2 urea treatments, respectively. The use of moderate doses of FGU in high-producing dairy cows may be justified based on its lower cost.
2023
A network meta-analysis of the impact of feed-grade and slow-release ureas on lactating dairy cattle / Simoni, M; Fernandez-Turren, G; Righi, F; Rodríguez-Prado, M; Calsamiglia, S. - In: JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE. - ISSN 0022-0302. - 106:5(2023), pp. 3233-3245. [10.3168/jds.2022-22786]
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2957714
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact