In recent years, the air transport market has experienced strong growth, increasing the demand for new civil aircraft, challenging the actual production rate of aerospace industries. The bottleneck of the production for the aviation industry lies in the capability of the manufacturing and assembly facilities to fulfill the module arrangement in the current design. The development of optimized product architecture requires the implementation of design for assembly principles at the conceptual design phase closing the gap between the design and the production departments. The study proposes a Conceptual Design for Assembly (CDfA) methodology which aims at the assessment of aircraft systems installation and assembly at the early phase of product development (conceptual design). The CDfA methodology allows comparing assembly performance of different aircraft architectures identifying critical modules and interfaces as well as assembly/installation issues. The methodology is based on a specific framework (hierarchical structure) which is characterized by levels, domains, and attributes. Levels enable the analysis of product architectures at different levels of granularity, splitting the global analysis into sub-problems (problem discretization). Domains and attributes are defined with a knowledge-based engineering approach considering available information at the conceptual design phase and production criteria. A complex system (the nose fuselage of a commercial aircraft) was chosen as a case study to test the robustness of the methodology in relation to the assembly performance observed within the manufacturing facilities. Results revealed the architectural elements (modules and interfaces) that contribute to inefficient assembly operations, as well as the rationales enabling to elaborate alternative architectures for an improved product industrial efficiency.
Conceptual Design for Assembly methodology formalization: systems installation analysis and manufacturing information integration in the design and development of aircraft architectures / Formentini, G.; Bouissiere, F.; Cuiller, C.; Dereux, P. -E.; Favi, C.. - In: JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION INTEGRATION. - ISSN 2452-414X. - 26:(2022), p. 100327.100327. [10.1016/j.jii.2022.100327]
Conceptual Design for Assembly methodology formalization: systems installation analysis and manufacturing information integration in the design and development of aircraft architectures
Formentini G.
;Favi C.
2022-01-01
Abstract
In recent years, the air transport market has experienced strong growth, increasing the demand for new civil aircraft, challenging the actual production rate of aerospace industries. The bottleneck of the production for the aviation industry lies in the capability of the manufacturing and assembly facilities to fulfill the module arrangement in the current design. The development of optimized product architecture requires the implementation of design for assembly principles at the conceptual design phase closing the gap between the design and the production departments. The study proposes a Conceptual Design for Assembly (CDfA) methodology which aims at the assessment of aircraft systems installation and assembly at the early phase of product development (conceptual design). The CDfA methodology allows comparing assembly performance of different aircraft architectures identifying critical modules and interfaces as well as assembly/installation issues. The methodology is based on a specific framework (hierarchical structure) which is characterized by levels, domains, and attributes. Levels enable the analysis of product architectures at different levels of granularity, splitting the global analysis into sub-problems (problem discretization). Domains and attributes are defined with a knowledge-based engineering approach considering available information at the conceptual design phase and production criteria. A complex system (the nose fuselage of a commercial aircraft) was chosen as a case study to test the robustness of the methodology in relation to the assembly performance observed within the manufacturing facilities. Results revealed the architectural elements (modules and interfaces) that contribute to inefficient assembly operations, as well as the rationales enabling to elaborate alternative architectures for an improved product industrial efficiency.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-04_CDfA Method - Revised.pdf
Open Access dal 02/03/2024
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.59 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.59 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
1-s2.0-S2452414X22000024-main.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Tipologia:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione
8.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.