The scenario we see today in the labor market in Italy is composed ofa progressive proliferation of non-standard contracts. This involves first and foremost a problem of citizenship and welfare, due to the lower or almostnon-existent possibility of access to social rights associated with these types of contracts. Faced with this situation, over the last ten years, Italy has seen the emergence of a complex social movement to counter precariousness. This movement at first concentrated its efforts in the rewriting of the symbolic vocabulary and imagination at work, in an attempt to consolidate the precarious as a collective subjectivity beyond its traditional representations. In recent years, however, this process of “self-representation”in terms of a collective narrative is matched by a process of “self-advocacy”: an effective self-organization of temporary workers to handle the conflict in the workplace. In a scenario of no confidence in political parties and trade unions in addressing the issue of precariousness, these movements refuse the delegation of the conflict, promoting instead a modality of action based on the organizational form of the network, sharing knowledge and direct representation. This paper explores two particular movement experiences in the Italian context.

Inspire and Conspire: Italian precarious workers between self-organization and self-advocacy / Murgia, Annalisa; Selmi, Giulia. - 4:2(2012), pp. 181-196.

Inspire and Conspire: Italian precarious workers between self-organization and self-advocacy

Giulia Selmi
2012-01-01

Abstract

The scenario we see today in the labor market in Italy is composed ofa progressive proliferation of non-standard contracts. This involves first and foremost a problem of citizenship and welfare, due to the lower or almostnon-existent possibility of access to social rights associated with these types of contracts. Faced with this situation, over the last ten years, Italy has seen the emergence of a complex social movement to counter precariousness. This movement at first concentrated its efforts in the rewriting of the symbolic vocabulary and imagination at work, in an attempt to consolidate the precarious as a collective subjectivity beyond its traditional representations. In recent years, however, this process of “self-representation”in terms of a collective narrative is matched by a process of “self-advocacy”: an effective self-organization of temporary workers to handle the conflict in the workplace. In a scenario of no confidence in political parties and trade unions in addressing the issue of precariousness, these movements refuse the delegation of the conflict, promoting instead a modality of action based on the organizational form of the network, sharing knowledge and direct representation. This paper explores two particular movement experiences in the Italian context.
2012
Inspire and Conspire: Italian precarious workers between self-organization and self-advocacy / Murgia, Annalisa; Selmi, Giulia. - 4:2(2012), pp. 181-196.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2915985
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact