The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the Abstract. “According to a five-risk group stratification, 23985 patients (32.8%) had no risk factor (0), 35019 (47.8%) had only one risk factor (1), 13275 (18.1%) had risk score 2854 (1.2%) had 3 risk factors and 84 (0.1%) of cases had a GRANT score of 4, respectively.” now reads: “According to a five-risk group stratification, 23985 patients (32.8%) had no risk factor (0), 35019 (47.8%) had only one risk factor (1), 13275 (18.1%) had risk score 2, 854 (1.2%) had 3 risk factors and 84 (0.1%) of cases had a GRANT score of 4, respectively.” This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Author Correction: Validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) score within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database: A new tool to predict survival in surgically treated renal cell carcinoma patients (Scientific Reports, (2019), 9, 1, (13218), 10.1038/s41598-019-49250-6) / Buti, S.; Karakiewicz, P. I.; Bersanelli, M.; Capitanio, U.; Tian, Z.; Cortellini, A.; Taguchi, S.; Briganti, A.; Montorsi, F.; Leonardi, F.; Bandini, M.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 10:1(2020). [10.1038/s41598-020-59358-9]
Author Correction: Validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) score within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database: A new tool to predict survival in surgically treated renal cell carcinoma patients (Scientific Reports, (2019), 9, 1, (13218), 10.1038/s41598-019-49250-6)
Buti S.;Bersanelli M.;
2020-01-01
Abstract
The original version of this Article contained a typographical error in the Abstract. “According to a five-risk group stratification, 23985 patients (32.8%) had no risk factor (0), 35019 (47.8%) had only one risk factor (1), 13275 (18.1%) had risk score 2854 (1.2%) had 3 risk factors and 84 (0.1%) of cases had a GRANT score of 4, respectively.” now reads: “According to a five-risk group stratification, 23985 patients (32.8%) had no risk factor (0), 35019 (47.8%) had only one risk factor (1), 13275 (18.1%) had risk score 2, 854 (1.2%) had 3 risk factors and 84 (0.1%) of cases had a GRANT score of 4, respectively.” This has now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Scientific Reports errata corrige.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
618.14 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
618.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
