Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation is often declared to be superior to its direct concurrent, i.e., orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation. However, the comparison is often performed under favorable conditions for OTFS as, for instance, the assumption of extremely high Doppler shifts and/or the approximation of delay and Doppler shifts to be integer multiples of the Doppler-delay resolution of OTFS modulation. In order to provide a fair comparison, this paper addresses a comparison in terms of the information-theoretic achievable rate under practical separate detection and decoding, explicitly considering the pilot overhead necessary to acquire the channel state information, the accuracy of the channel estimation, and any other possible additional loss. We do not claim to establish in a definitive way which is the best modulation format, since the choice thereof depends on many other features which are outside the scope of this work (e.g., legacy, intellectual property, ease and know-how for implementation, and many other criteria). Nevertheless, we provide the foundations to properly compare multi-carrier communication systems in terms of their information theoretic achievable rate potential, within meaningful and sensible assumptions on the channel models and on the receiver complexity (both in terms of channel estimation and in terms of soft-output symbol detection).
On Achievable Rate of OFDM and OTFS in the Presence of Sparsity / Gaudio, L.; Caire, G.; Colavolpe, G.. - STAMPA. - (2021), pp. 9473825.1-9473825.6. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, ICC Workshops 2021 tenutosi a Montreal, Canada nel 2021) [10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473825].
On Achievable Rate of OFDM and OTFS in the Presence of Sparsity
Gaudio L.;Caire G.;Colavolpe G.
2021-01-01
Abstract
Orthogonal time frequency space (OTFS) modulation is often declared to be superior to its direct concurrent, i.e., orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) modulation. However, the comparison is often performed under favorable conditions for OTFS as, for instance, the assumption of extremely high Doppler shifts and/or the approximation of delay and Doppler shifts to be integer multiples of the Doppler-delay resolution of OTFS modulation. In order to provide a fair comparison, this paper addresses a comparison in terms of the information-theoretic achievable rate under practical separate detection and decoding, explicitly considering the pilot overhead necessary to acquire the channel state information, the accuracy of the channel estimation, and any other possible additional loss. We do not claim to establish in a definitive way which is the best modulation format, since the choice thereof depends on many other features which are outside the scope of this work (e.g., legacy, intellectual property, ease and know-how for implementation, and many other criteria). Nevertheless, we provide the foundations to properly compare multi-carrier communication systems in terms of their information theoretic achievable rate potential, within meaningful and sensible assumptions on the channel models and on the receiver complexity (both in terms of channel estimation and in terms of soft-output symbol detection).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.