Background and aims: No consensus exists on how aggressively to treat relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) nor on the timing of the treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate disability trajectories in RRMS patients treated with an early intensive treatment (EIT) or with a moderate-efficacy treatment followed by escalation to higher-efficacy disease modifying therapy (ESC). Methods: RRMS patients with ⩾5-year follow-up and ⩾3 visits after disease modifying therapy (DMT) start were selected from the Italian MS Registry. EIT group included patients who received as first DMT fingolimod, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, cladribine. ESC group patients received the high efficacy DMT after ⩾1 year of glatiramer acetate, interferons, azathioprine, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate treatment. Patients were 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched for characteristics at the first DMT. The disability trajectories were evaluated by applying a longitudinal model for repeated measures. The effect of early versus late start of high-efficacy DMT was assessed by the mean annual Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes compared with baseline values (delta-EDSS) in EIT and ESC groups. Results: The study cohort included 2702 RRMS patients. The PS matching procedure produced 363 pairs, followed for a median (interquartile range) of 8.5 (6.5–11.7) years. Mean annual delta-EDSS values were all significantly (p < 0.02) higher in the ESC group compared with the EIT group. In particular, the mean delta-EDSS differences between the two groups tended to increase from 0.1 (0.01–0.19, p = 0.03) at 1 year to 0.30 (0.07–0.53, p = 0.009) at 5 years and to 0.67 (0.31–1.03, p = 0.0003) at 10 years. Conclusion: Our results indicate that EIT strategy is more effective than ESC strategy in controlling disability progression over time.

Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies / Iaffaldano, P.; Lucisano, G.; Caputo, F.; Paolicelli, D.; Patti, F.; Zaffaroni, M.; Brescia Morra, V.; Pozzilli, C.; De Luca, G.; Inglese, M.; Salemi, G.; Maniscalco, G. T.; Cocco, E.; Sola, P.; Lus, G.; Conte, A.; Amato, M. P.; Granella, F.; Gasperini, C.; Bellantonio, P.; Totaro, R.; Rovaris, M.; Salvetti, M.; Torri Clerici, V. L. A.; Bergamaschi, R.; Maimone, D.; Scarpini, E.; Capobianco, M.; Comi, G.; Filippi, M.; Trojano, M.. - In: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS. - ISSN 1756-2856. - 14(2021), p. 17562864211019574. [10.1177/17562864211019574]

Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies

Granella F.;
2021

Abstract

Background and aims: No consensus exists on how aggressively to treat relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) nor on the timing of the treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate disability trajectories in RRMS patients treated with an early intensive treatment (EIT) or with a moderate-efficacy treatment followed by escalation to higher-efficacy disease modifying therapy (ESC). Methods: RRMS patients with ⩾5-year follow-up and ⩾3 visits after disease modifying therapy (DMT) start were selected from the Italian MS Registry. EIT group included patients who received as first DMT fingolimod, natalizumab, mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, cladribine. ESC group patients received the high efficacy DMT after ⩾1 year of glatiramer acetate, interferons, azathioprine, teriflunomide or dimethylfumarate treatment. Patients were 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched for characteristics at the first DMT. The disability trajectories were evaluated by applying a longitudinal model for repeated measures. The effect of early versus late start of high-efficacy DMT was assessed by the mean annual Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) changes compared with baseline values (delta-EDSS) in EIT and ESC groups. Results: The study cohort included 2702 RRMS patients. The PS matching procedure produced 363 pairs, followed for a median (interquartile range) of 8.5 (6.5–11.7) years. Mean annual delta-EDSS values were all significantly (p < 0.02) higher in the ESC group compared with the EIT group. In particular, the mean delta-EDSS differences between the two groups tended to increase from 0.1 (0.01–0.19, p = 0.03) at 1 year to 0.30 (0.07–0.53, p = 0.009) at 5 years and to 0.67 (0.31–1.03, p = 0.0003) at 10 years. Conclusion: Our results indicate that EIT strategy is more effective than ESC strategy in controlling disability progression over time.
Long-term disability trajectories in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with early intensive or escalation treatment strategies / Iaffaldano, P.; Lucisano, G.; Caputo, F.; Paolicelli, D.; Patti, F.; Zaffaroni, M.; Brescia Morra, V.; Pozzilli, C.; De Luca, G.; Inglese, M.; Salemi, G.; Maniscalco, G. T.; Cocco, E.; Sola, P.; Lus, G.; Conte, A.; Amato, M. P.; Granella, F.; Gasperini, C.; Bellantonio, P.; Totaro, R.; Rovaris, M.; Salvetti, M.; Torri Clerici, V. L. A.; Bergamaschi, R.; Maimone, D.; Scarpini, E.; Capobianco, M.; Comi, G.; Filippi, M.; Trojano, M.. - In: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS. - ISSN 1756-2856. - 14(2021), p. 17562864211019574. [10.1177/17562864211019574]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Iaffaldano Long-term disability trajectories Ther Adv Neurol Dis 2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 901.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
901.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2898799
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact