Improving the eco-efficiency of food systems is one of the major global challenges faced by the modern world. Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are commonly regarded to be less harmful to the environment, among various reasons, due to their organizational distribution and thus the shortened physical distance between primary producers and final consumers. In this paper, we empirically test this hypothesis, by assessing and comparing the environmental impacts of short and long food supply chains. Based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, we calculate eco-efficiency indicators for nine types of food distribution chains. The analysis is performed on a sample of 428 short and long food supply chains from six European countries. Our results indicate that, on average, long food supply chains may generate less negative environmental impacts than short chains (in terms of fossil fuel energy consumption, pollution, and GHG emissions) per kg of a given product. The values of eco-efficiency indicators display a large variability across analyzed chains, and especially across different types of SFSCs. The analysis shows that the environmental impacts of the food distribution process are not only determined by the geographical distance between producer and consumer, but depend on numerous factors, including the supply chain infrastructure.

Are short food supply chains more environmentally sustainable than long chains? a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the eco-efficiency of food chains in selected EU countries / Majewski, E.; Komerska, A.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Malak-Rawlikowska, A.; Was, A.; Sulewski, P.; Gola, M.; Pogodzinska, K.; Lecoeur, J. -L.; Tocco, B.; Torok, A.; Donati, M.; Vitterso, G.. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - 13:18(2020), p. 4853. [10.3390/en13184853]

Are short food supply chains more environmentally sustainable than long chains? a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the eco-efficiency of food chains in selected EU countries

Donati M.;
2020

Abstract

Improving the eco-efficiency of food systems is one of the major global challenges faced by the modern world. Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are commonly regarded to be less harmful to the environment, among various reasons, due to their organizational distribution and thus the shortened physical distance between primary producers and final consumers. In this paper, we empirically test this hypothesis, by assessing and comparing the environmental impacts of short and long food supply chains. Based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, we calculate eco-efficiency indicators for nine types of food distribution chains. The analysis is performed on a sample of 428 short and long food supply chains from six European countries. Our results indicate that, on average, long food supply chains may generate less negative environmental impacts than short chains (in terms of fossil fuel energy consumption, pollution, and GHG emissions) per kg of a given product. The values of eco-efficiency indicators display a large variability across analyzed chains, and especially across different types of SFSCs. The analysis shows that the environmental impacts of the food distribution process are not only determined by the geographical distance between producer and consumer, but depend on numerous factors, including the supply chain infrastructure.
Are short food supply chains more environmentally sustainable than long chains? a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the eco-efficiency of food chains in selected EU countries / Majewski, E.; Komerska, A.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Malak-Rawlikowska, A.; Was, A.; Sulewski, P.; Gola, M.; Pogodzinska, K.; Lecoeur, J. -L.; Tocco, B.; Torok, A.; Donati, M.; Vitterso, G.. - In: ENERGIES. - ISSN 1996-1073. - 13:18(2020), p. 4853. [10.3390/en13184853]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
energies-13-04853 (2).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione (PDF) editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.97 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.97 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11381/2882180
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact