We are living a time of crisis for both the metropolis form and the post-fordist circuit of valorization based on it. In this context, talking about a return to the land risks evo - king the practical and theoretical quicksand of a consolatory lamentation rather than a necessary effort of heuristic understanding and political imagination. Against this possibility, through an analysis of the progressive financialization of agriculture, we will show how the idea of a pure and pre-capitalistic rurality is problematic. Finally, we will develop the “back to the land” issue affirmatively, by connecting it to recent studies concerning the production of the common/s.
Back to the Land: Which Return? To What Land? / Leonardi, E. - In: SDT SCIENZE DEL TERRITORIO. - 1:(2013), pp. 225-230.
Back to the Land: Which Return? To What Land?
Leonardi E
2013-01-01
Abstract
We are living a time of crisis for both the metropolis form and the post-fordist circuit of valorization based on it. In this context, talking about a return to the land risks evo - king the practical and theoretical quicksand of a consolatory lamentation rather than a necessary effort of heuristic understanding and political imagination. Against this possibility, through an analysis of the progressive financialization of agriculture, we will show how the idea of a pure and pre-capitalistic rurality is problematic. Finally, we will develop the “back to the land” issue affirmatively, by connecting it to recent studies concerning the production of the common/s.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.