The reading “O factum male, o miselle passer!” is not to be attributed to the editio Parmensis (1473), despite general agreement among recent edi- tors about its attribution. A manuscript, London, British Library, Egerton 3027 (1467), seems to be its oldest witness. Earlier manuscripts, however, include separate parts of the reading. That’s why the scribe of Egerton 3207, the poet and scholar Pacifico Massimi, is not be definetly credited with this emendation to the inconsistent reading of O G R at 3,16 bonum factum bonus ille passer.
NOTA A CATULL. 3,16 / Agnesini, Alex. - In: PAIDEIA. - ISSN 0030-9435. - 69:(2014), pp. 575-581. [10.1400/227209]
NOTA A CATULL. 3,16
AGNESINI, Alex
2014-01-01
Abstract
The reading “O factum male, o miselle passer!” is not to be attributed to the editio Parmensis (1473), despite general agreement among recent edi- tors about its attribution. A manuscript, London, British Library, Egerton 3027 (1467), seems to be its oldest witness. Earlier manuscripts, however, include separate parts of the reading. That’s why the scribe of Egerton 3207, the poet and scholar Pacifico Massimi, is not be definetly credited with this emendation to the inconsistent reading of O G R at 3,16 bonum factum bonus ille passer.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
gsdf.pdf
non disponibili
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
84.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
84.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
