The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of fenofibrate versus simvastatin on various HDL-related biomarkers in dyslipidemic patients with low HDL-C, in whom it is as yet unclear whether a statin or a fibrate is the most appropriate treatment. Fifty-two patients received either fenofibrate (160 mg/day) or simvastatin (40 mg/day) for 8 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. Simvastatin effectively lowered plasma LDL-C and apoB levels, but did not change plasma HDL levels and HDL-related biomarkers, except for a small, significant increase in the capacity of plasma to promote SR-BI mediated cholesterol efflux. Fenofibrate did not affect plasma LDL-C levels but lowered triglycerides, and exerted a remarkable HDL-C raising activity (+22%), with patients in the lowest range of HDL-C getting the maximal benefit. The HDL-C raise was associated with a shift of HDL from large to small particles, and from LpA-I to LpA-I:A-II, which might explain the observed increase in the plasma capacity to promote ABCA1 mediated efflux with no changes in SR-BI efflux. The distinct and complementary effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on lipid parameters and HDL-related biomarkers suggest that a combination therapy with the two drugs in dyslipidemic patients with low HDL would be fully justified.

Effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on HDL-related biomarkers in low-HDL patients / Franceschini, G.; Calabresi, L.; Colombo, C.; Favari, Elda; Bernini, Franco; Sirtori, C. R.. - In: ATHEROSCLEROSIS. - ISSN 0021-9150. - 195:(2007), pp. 385-391. [10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.10.017]

Effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on HDL-related biomarkers in low-HDL patients

FAVARI, Elda;BERNINI, Franco;
2007-01-01

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of fenofibrate versus simvastatin on various HDL-related biomarkers in dyslipidemic patients with low HDL-C, in whom it is as yet unclear whether a statin or a fibrate is the most appropriate treatment. Fifty-two patients received either fenofibrate (160 mg/day) or simvastatin (40 mg/day) for 8 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial. Simvastatin effectively lowered plasma LDL-C and apoB levels, but did not change plasma HDL levels and HDL-related biomarkers, except for a small, significant increase in the capacity of plasma to promote SR-BI mediated cholesterol efflux. Fenofibrate did not affect plasma LDL-C levels but lowered triglycerides, and exerted a remarkable HDL-C raising activity (+22%), with patients in the lowest range of HDL-C getting the maximal benefit. The HDL-C raise was associated with a shift of HDL from large to small particles, and from LpA-I to LpA-I:A-II, which might explain the observed increase in the plasma capacity to promote ABCA1 mediated efflux with no changes in SR-BI efflux. The distinct and complementary effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on lipid parameters and HDL-related biomarkers suggest that a combination therapy with the two drugs in dyslipidemic patients with low HDL would be fully justified.
2007
Effects of fenofibrate and simvastatin on HDL-related biomarkers in low-HDL patients / Franceschini, G.; Calabresi, L.; Colombo, C.; Favari, Elda; Bernini, Franco; Sirtori, C. R.. - In: ATHEROSCLEROSIS. - ISSN 0021-9150. - 195:(2007), pp. 385-391. [10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.10.017]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Favari, Franceschini et al. ATH 2007.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 139.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
139.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Abs Favari, Franceschini ATH2007.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Abstract
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 17.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
17.9 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/1656155
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact