A series of histamine H-2 receptor antagonists with different lipophilicity were tested in cardiac and gastric assays in order to reveal possible differences in receptor affinity. Lipophilicity of the compounds was expressed as CLOG P (theoretically-determined logarithm of octanol:water partition coefficient) and log k' (logarithm of capacity factor, experimentally-determined by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography). 2 Aminopotentidine (APT) and iodoaminopotentidine (I-APT), which are both lipophilic compounds, behaved as insurmountable antagonists of histamine responses in rat isolated gastric fundus (pK(B) = 6.20+/-0.16 and 6.89+/-0.19, respectively) and guinea-pig isolated papillary muscle (pK(B) = 6.34+/-0.37 and 6.81+/-0.26, respectively). They were approximately as effective as ranitidine (RAN) in reducing histamine-induced acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat, ID50 values being 0.018+/-0.02, 0.020+/-0.03 and 0.036+/-0.01 mu mol kg(-1) i.v. for APT, I-APT and RAN, respectively. Both APT and I-APT had a significantly longer duration of action than RAN. 3 The hydrophilic compound, SK&F 92857, was inactive up to 10 mu M in modifying histamine-induced acid secretion in the isolated rat stomach. In the papillary muscle, low concentrations (0.1-1 mu M) of this compound produced a competitive antagonism of the histamine responses (pA(2) value=7.38+/-0.11), while a higher concentration (10 mu M) significantly reduced the maximal response to histamine. 4 RAN competitively antagonized histamine effects with a comparable affinity in cardiac and gastric preparations (pA(2) values were 6.42+/-0.09 and 6.78+/-0.38 in heart and stomach, respectively). 5 Results obtained in this study clearly showed that the discrepancies between gastric and cardiac effects observed for some H-2 antagonists are not explained solely by differences in lipophilicity of compounds. Moreover, the significant correlation found between CLOG P and log k' parameter, which takes into account, besides their lipophilicity, the ionization of the molecules, suggests that ionization has a similar influence for all the molecules on the partition between the lipophilic and aqueous phase.
Cardiac and gastric effects of hsitamine H2 receptor antagonists: no evidence for a correlation between lipophilicity and receptor affinity / Coruzzi, Gabriella; Adami, Maristella; Pozzoli, Cristina; Giorgi, F.; Bertaccini, G.. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 0007-1188. - 118:(1996), pp. 1813-1821. [10.1159/000280603]
Cardiac and gastric effects of hsitamine H2 receptor antagonists: no evidence for a correlation between lipophilicity and receptor affinity
CORUZZI, Gabriella;ADAMI, Maristella;POZZOLI, Cristina;
1996-01-01
Abstract
A series of histamine H-2 receptor antagonists with different lipophilicity were tested in cardiac and gastric assays in order to reveal possible differences in receptor affinity. Lipophilicity of the compounds was expressed as CLOG P (theoretically-determined logarithm of octanol:water partition coefficient) and log k' (logarithm of capacity factor, experimentally-determined by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography). 2 Aminopotentidine (APT) and iodoaminopotentidine (I-APT), which are both lipophilic compounds, behaved as insurmountable antagonists of histamine responses in rat isolated gastric fundus (pK(B) = 6.20+/-0.16 and 6.89+/-0.19, respectively) and guinea-pig isolated papillary muscle (pK(B) = 6.34+/-0.37 and 6.81+/-0.26, respectively). They were approximately as effective as ranitidine (RAN) in reducing histamine-induced acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat, ID50 values being 0.018+/-0.02, 0.020+/-0.03 and 0.036+/-0.01 mu mol kg(-1) i.v. for APT, I-APT and RAN, respectively. Both APT and I-APT had a significantly longer duration of action than RAN. 3 The hydrophilic compound, SK&F 92857, was inactive up to 10 mu M in modifying histamine-induced acid secretion in the isolated rat stomach. In the papillary muscle, low concentrations (0.1-1 mu M) of this compound produced a competitive antagonism of the histamine responses (pA(2) value=7.38+/-0.11), while a higher concentration (10 mu M) significantly reduced the maximal response to histamine. 4 RAN competitively antagonized histamine effects with a comparable affinity in cardiac and gastric preparations (pA(2) values were 6.42+/-0.09 and 6.78+/-0.38 in heart and stomach, respectively). 5 Results obtained in this study clearly showed that the discrepancies between gastric and cardiac effects observed for some H-2 antagonists are not explained solely by differences in lipophilicity of compounds. Moreover, the significant correlation found between CLOG P and log k' parameter, which takes into account, besides their lipophilicity, the ionization of the molecules, suggests that ionization has a similar influence for all the molecules on the partition between the lipophilic and aqueous phase.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.