In this paper I argue that Husserl's critique of naturalism does not amount to a one-sided rejection of it. I illustrate Husserl's anti-emergentism about the mind and insist on the distinction between the eidetic and the transcendental dimension of phenomenology. The so-called mind/body problem only arises and can be meaningfully tackled as an eidetic problem within the naturalistic attitude.

The Relative Right of Naturalism. Reassessing Husserl on the Mind/Body Problem / Staiti, ANDREA SEBASTIANO. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 125-150.

The Relative Right of Naturalism. Reassessing Husserl on the Mind/Body Problem

STAITI, ANDREA SEBASTIANO
2016-01-01

Abstract

In this paper I argue that Husserl's critique of naturalism does not amount to a one-sided rejection of it. I illustrate Husserl's anti-emergentism about the mind and insist on the distinction between the eidetic and the transcendental dimension of phenomenology. The so-called mind/body problem only arises and can be meaningfully tackled as an eidetic problem within the naturalistic attitude.
2016
The Relative Right of Naturalism. Reassessing Husserl on the Mind/Body Problem / Staiti, ANDREA SEBASTIANO. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 125-150.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2822501
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact