ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of gestation-adjusted birth-weight estimation using a three-dimensional (3D) fractional thigh volume (TVol) method in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to compare it with the conventional two-dimensional method of Hadlock et al. Methods Pregnant women with GDM were referred at 34 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation for ultrasound examination. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was obtained using both the Hadlock and the TVol methods. Using a gestationadjusted projection method, predicted birth weight was compared to actual birth weight at delivery. Results Based on 125 pregnancies, the TVol method with gestation-adjusted projection had a mean (±SD) percentage error in estimating birth weight of −0.01±5.0 (95% CI, −0.96 to 0.98)% while the method of Hadlock with gestation-adjusted projection had an error of 1.28±9.1 (95% CI, −0.33 to 2.87)%. The mean percentage error of the two methods was significantly different (P=0.039), while the random error was not (P=1.0). For the prediction of macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g, n=19), sensitivity was 84 and 63% for the TVol and Hadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference −2 to 44%, P=0.22) and specificity was 96 and 89% for the TVol andHadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference 5–9%, P=0.01). Conclusions In women with GDM, a new method of estimating birth weight based on 3D-TVol measurements performed at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation and gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight, is more accurate than the standard method based on Hadlock’s formula in predicting birth weight. The Correspondence to: Dr F. Prefumo, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Brescia Piazzale Spedali Civili,1, 25123 Brescia, Italy (e-mail: federico.prefumo@gmail.com) Accepted: 1 March 2013 TVol method has comparable sensitivity but higher specificity than the Hadlockmethod in predicting neonatal macrosomia.

Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection / Pagani, G.; Palai, N.; Zatti, S.; Fratelli, N.; Prefumo, F.; Frusca, Tiziana. - In: ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0960-7692. - 43:1(2013), pp. 72-76. [DOI: 10.1002/uog.12458]

Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.

FRUSCA, Tiziana
2013-01-01

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of gestation-adjusted birth-weight estimation using a three-dimensional (3D) fractional thigh volume (TVol) method in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and to compare it with the conventional two-dimensional method of Hadlock et al. Methods Pregnant women with GDM were referred at 34 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation for ultrasound examination. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) was obtained using both the Hadlock and the TVol methods. Using a gestationadjusted projection method, predicted birth weight was compared to actual birth weight at delivery. Results Based on 125 pregnancies, the TVol method with gestation-adjusted projection had a mean (±SD) percentage error in estimating birth weight of −0.01±5.0 (95% CI, −0.96 to 0.98)% while the method of Hadlock with gestation-adjusted projection had an error of 1.28±9.1 (95% CI, −0.33 to 2.87)%. The mean percentage error of the two methods was significantly different (P=0.039), while the random error was not (P=1.0). For the prediction of macrosomia (birth weight ≥4000 g, n=19), sensitivity was 84 and 63% for the TVol and Hadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference −2 to 44%, P=0.22) and specificity was 96 and 89% for the TVol andHadlock methods, respectively (95% CI for difference 5–9%, P=0.01). Conclusions In women with GDM, a new method of estimating birth weight based on 3D-TVol measurements performed at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks’ gestation and gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight, is more accurate than the standard method based on Hadlock’s formula in predicting birth weight. The Correspondence to: Dr F. Prefumo, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Brescia Piazzale Spedali Civili,1, 25123 Brescia, Italy (e-mail: federico.prefumo@gmail.com) Accepted: 1 March 2013 TVol method has comparable sensitivity but higher specificity than the Hadlockmethod in predicting neonatal macrosomia.
2013
Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection / Pagani, G.; Palai, N.; Zatti, S.; Fratelli, N.; Prefumo, F.; Frusca, Tiziana. - In: ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 0960-7692. - 43:1(2013), pp. 72-76. [DOI: 10.1002/uog.12458]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
uog12458.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 107.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
107.88 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2681605
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact