With the steadily increasing number of publications in the field of stress research it has become evident that the conventional usage of the stress concept bears considerable problems. The use of the term ‘stress’ to conditions ranging from even the mildest challenging stimulation to severely aversive conditions, is in our view inappropriate. Review of the literature reveals that the physiological ‘stress’ response to appetitive, rewarding stimuli that are often not considered to be stressors can be as large as the response to negative stimuli. Analysis of the physiological response during exercise supports the view that the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response reflects the metabolic and physiological demands required for behavioural activity. We propose that the term ‘stress’ should be restricted to conditions where an environmental demand exceeds the natural regulatory capacity of an organism, in particular situations that include unpredictability and uncontrollability. Physiologically, stress seems to be characterized by either the absence of an anticipatory response (unpredictable) or a reduced recovery (uncontrollable) of the neuroendocrine reaction. The consequences of this restricted definition for stress research and the interpretation of results in terms of the adaptive and/or maladaptive nature of the response are discussed.

Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept / Koolhaas, Jm; Bartolomucci, Alessandro; Buwalda, B; de Boer, S; Flügge, G; Korte S., M; Meerlo, Peter; Murison, R; Olivier, B; Palanza, Paola; Richter Levin, G; Sgoifo, Andrea; Steimer, T; Stiedl, O; van Dijk, G; Wöhr, M; Fuchs, E.. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 35:5(2011), pp. 1291-1301. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003]

Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept

BARTOLOMUCCI, Alessandro;MEERLO, Peter;PALANZA, Paola;SGOIFO, Andrea;
2011-01-01

Abstract

With the steadily increasing number of publications in the field of stress research it has become evident that the conventional usage of the stress concept bears considerable problems. The use of the term ‘stress’ to conditions ranging from even the mildest challenging stimulation to severely aversive conditions, is in our view inappropriate. Review of the literature reveals that the physiological ‘stress’ response to appetitive, rewarding stimuli that are often not considered to be stressors can be as large as the response to negative stimuli. Analysis of the physiological response during exercise supports the view that the magnitude of the neuroendocrine response reflects the metabolic and physiological demands required for behavioural activity. We propose that the term ‘stress’ should be restricted to conditions where an environmental demand exceeds the natural regulatory capacity of an organism, in particular situations that include unpredictability and uncontrollability. Physiologically, stress seems to be characterized by either the absence of an anticipatory response (unpredictable) or a reduced recovery (uncontrollable) of the neuroendocrine reaction. The consequences of this restricted definition for stress research and the interpretation of results in terms of the adaptive and/or maladaptive nature of the response are discussed.
2011
Stress revisited: a critical evaluation of the stress concept / Koolhaas, Jm; Bartolomucci, Alessandro; Buwalda, B; de Boer, S; Flügge, G; Korte S., M; Meerlo, Peter; Murison, R; Olivier, B; Palanza, Paola; Richter Levin, G; Sgoifo, Andrea; Steimer, T; Stiedl, O; van Dijk, G; Wöhr, M; Fuchs, E.. - In: NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS. - ISSN 0149-7634. - 35:5(2011), pp. 1291-1301. [10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.003]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
nbr-kool-11.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 1.15 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.15 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2451250
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1021
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 928
social impact