Abstract: Objective Our aim was to examine the temporal variability in congenital heart defect (CHD) birth prevalence from 1980 to 2000 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Methods The study population consisted of all infants, surveyed by the Emilia-Romagna birth defects registry (Indagine Malformazioni conpenite in Emilia-Romagna [IMER]), who were affected by CHDs. A simplified classification into "simple" and "complex" CHD was adopted. A comparison with another epidemiologic study using different methodology in the same area was performed. Results From 1980 to 2000, IMER ascertained 2442 live births With CHD of 480,793 infants born, with an average CHD birth prevalence of 5.1%, (Range, 3.1% to 7.5%). A significant increase in prevalence of simple CHD during the second decade of the study was demonstrated because of an increased recognition of "minor" cardiac lesions among the simple CHD. The birth prevalence of complex CHD remained stable. Conclusions The apparent increase in live births with CHD results mainly from the current widespread availability of color Doppler echocardiography, which allows the early detection of the "minor" cardiac defects. Other differences are the result of the sources of ascertainment, diagnostic criteria, system of classification, and especially the age limit for enrolling infants with suspected CHD.

Temporal variability in birth prevalence of congenital heart defects as recorded by a general birth defects registry / Bosi, G; Garani, G; Scorrano, M; E., Calzolari; IMER Working Group: G., Astolfi; G., Cocchi; Magnani, Cinzia; D., Prandstraller. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS. - ISSN 0340-6199. - 142 (6):(2003), pp. 690-698. [10.1067/mpd.2003.243]

Temporal variability in birth prevalence of congenital heart defects as recorded by a general birth defects registry

MAGNANI, Cinzia;
2003-01-01

Abstract

Abstract: Objective Our aim was to examine the temporal variability in congenital heart defect (CHD) birth prevalence from 1980 to 2000 in Emilia-Romagna, Italy. Methods The study population consisted of all infants, surveyed by the Emilia-Romagna birth defects registry (Indagine Malformazioni conpenite in Emilia-Romagna [IMER]), who were affected by CHDs. A simplified classification into "simple" and "complex" CHD was adopted. A comparison with another epidemiologic study using different methodology in the same area was performed. Results From 1980 to 2000, IMER ascertained 2442 live births With CHD of 480,793 infants born, with an average CHD birth prevalence of 5.1%, (Range, 3.1% to 7.5%). A significant increase in prevalence of simple CHD during the second decade of the study was demonstrated because of an increased recognition of "minor" cardiac lesions among the simple CHD. The birth prevalence of complex CHD remained stable. Conclusions The apparent increase in live births with CHD results mainly from the current widespread availability of color Doppler echocardiography, which allows the early detection of the "minor" cardiac defects. Other differences are the result of the sources of ascertainment, diagnostic criteria, system of classification, and especially the age limit for enrolling infants with suspected CHD.
2003
Temporal variability in birth prevalence of congenital heart defects as recorded by a general birth defects registry / Bosi, G; Garani, G; Scorrano, M; E., Calzolari; IMER Working Group: G., Astolfi; G., Cocchi; Magnani, Cinzia; D., Prandstraller. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS. - ISSN 0340-6199. - 142 (6):(2003), pp. 690-698. [10.1067/mpd.2003.243]
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Temporal variabillity in birth prevalence of congenital heart defects.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: NON PUBBLICO - Accesso privato/ristretto
Dimensione 37.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
37.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11381/2436063
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact